Federal Minister for Maritime Affairs Muhammad Junaid Anwar Chaudhry has constituted an inquiry committee to investigate the cause of a fire at the Karachi International Container Terminal (KICT) and to fix responsibility to prevent similar incidents in the future.

According to a statement issued on Saturday, the committee will comprise senior officers from the Karachi Port Trust (KPT), who will coordinate with KICT operators to determine the reasons for the incident. The minister said KICT is a private terminal and that primary responsibility for safety measures rests with its administration.

Following media reports of the fire, the minister took immediate notice of the incident and directed all concerned officials, including KPT Chairman Rear Admiral (Retd) Shahid Ahmed, to ensure an immediate response. He also ordered the utilisation of all available resources to bring the fire under control and sought a detailed report.

The KPT senior team supervised the firefighting operation, which successfully brought the fire under control. No loss of life was reported. The minister said the coordinated response of the Karachi Port Trust, Pakistan Navy, Rescue 1122 and Karachi Shipyard fire units helped avert major losses. He said the extent of financial losses and the exact cause of the fire had yet to be determined and that investigations were ongoing.

According to the report submitted by KPT, the fire erupted at around 1:35pm in a container near Berth No 27 at the KICT terminal on West Wharf, Karachi Port.

On New Year’s Day 2026, the release of the Household Integrated Economic Survey (HIES) 2024-25 revealed that 20.3 million children remain out of school. Based on the first fully digital post-Census 2023 survey of 32,000 households, the data shows that Pakistan’s “education emergency” is not an abstract policy failure but a matter of household arithmetic, illustrating how a Rs100 note in a Pakistani father’s hand disappears before it can keep a child in school.

Countdown to zero

The survey shows how households spend their income and identifies the top three “life costs” that consume most of every Rs100 earned. Translating the 2024-25 HIES data into daily budgets reveals what the report describes as a “countdown to zero”.

Assuming every Rs100 earned represents total household expenditure, the 37% share allocated to food and beverages becomes a literal Rs37 taken from the wallet before the day begins. Once the Rs37 (36.72) for food is deducted from a hundred-rupee note, the countdown accelerates as Rs26 (25.72) is immediately claimed by housing and utilities.

This combined 63% (62.44) share, described as the “survival wall”, creates an economic chokehold. Before a family can consider a child’s future, nearly two-thirds of its income has already vanished into non-negotiable costs of bread, light and heat. In this imbalance, the state’s utility demands outweigh what a father can spare for schooling by almost ten to one, leaving just Rs2.50 (Rs2.48) for education.

Population divided into quintiles

Quintiles divide the population into five equal segments of 20% each. The first quintile represents the poorest 20% of households, followed by the lower-middle, middle, upper-middle and richest 20%.

Interpreting the graphs, renowned economist Dr Sajid Amin Javed, Deputy Executive Director and Founding Head of the Policy Solutions Lab at the Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), told The Express Tribune that a decline in the share of spending on education is not an automatic indicator of neglect or poverty. “In higher-income groups, rising incomes often outpace relatively stable education costs, shrinking the education spending ratio,” he said.

“However, a stark contrast appears in the bottom 40%, whose limited income is almost entirely spent on necessities, especially food, driven by stagnant wages and peak food inflation. This reveals a much harsher story of survival.” For these households, non-negotiable costs absorb the vast majority of income, leaving little room for other expenses. While education ratios may appear low because fees remain stable, Dr Javed said the persistently high share of food expenditure among the bottom 40% is the true marker of economic distress.

The ‘survival wall’

The struggle for a child’s future begins with the forced subtraction of the present. Before a student can pick up a pencil, a large “survival wall” consumes most of the household income.

The hunger cost takes the first Rs37 for basic food and nutrition, leaving Rs63. Next, the cost of light and heat takes Rs26 for electricity, gas and rent, leaving Rs37. Finally, only Rs2.50 is allocated for school fees and supplies. By the time these essentials are addressed, the family has already hit a survival wall of Rs63. The remaining Rs37 must cover all other necessities, including transport, medicine, clothing and emergencies.

Out-of-school children

While Rs2.50 for education may appear a minor line item in a household budget, global data suggests it is one of the strongest predictors of a family’s ability to escape poverty.

World Bank Global Director for Education and Skills Luis Benveniste has described education as an “economic imperative for individual prosperity”. The 2024–25 HIES, following the 2023 Digital Census, shows that the national out-of-school rate fell slightly from 30% to 28%. Despite this marginal improvement, around 20 million children remain out of school, with 20% never enrolled and 8% dropping out after initial attendance.

According to Khanzaib Ahmad, research assistant at the IBA Economic Growth and Forecasting initiative, inflation has forced Pakistani parents to reduce education spending from 3.98% to 2.48% of household budgets to cover food and utilities. Despite this reduction, literacy rose to 63% and out-of-school rates declined, reflecting increased awareness, reliance on community options and household resilience, even as government education spending remains at 0.8% of GDP. Echoing Dr Javed, Ahmad noted that the bottom 40% of households, often with seven or more members, are trapped in subsistence living. Nearly all available resources go toward basic staples, leaving no financial space for education or economic mobility.

Provincial breakdown

The provincial picture shows persistent divides. In Punjab, 21% of children are out of school, while food insecurity affects 22.6% of households. The Rs2.50 that could be allocated to schooling is often diverted to meet rising food costs.

In Sindh, 39% of children are out of school. The Rs2.50 for education cannot cover uniforms or transport, while Rs63 spent on food and utilities leaves many rural families unable to begin the enrolment process, which often never starts.

In Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, 28% of children are out of school. Even when Rs2.50 is spared, underfunded schools mean seven in ten children are classified as “learning poor”, unable to read a basic sentence by the age of 10.

Balochistan faces the most severe challenge, with 45% of children out of school. With food insecurity exceeding 30%, the entire Rs100 earned by many households is consumed by survival needs, pushing families into a permanent deficit.

Gilgit-Baltistan records the lowest rate, with 18% of children out of school, showing that strong local community engagement can reduce “survival wall” barriers even during economic hardship.

Sacrificing tomorrow for today’s heat and light

Federal and Sindh education ministers did not comment. Ministry sources said conditions are better in capitals and major cities, where private schooling options exist. For ordinary households, however, many children are withdrawn from school due to the inability to afford basic learning materials, forcing early work.

The most painful 2026 indicator is the 8% dropout rate, with children pushed out by economic necessity. Four in ten boys leave school for “odd jobs” to recover the Rs26 spent on utility bills.

This arithmetic shows the education crisis cannot be separated from the cost of living. With the survival wall fixed at 63%, the Rs2.50 for a child’s education remains at constant risk. Until the state eases the Rs63 burden of food and fuel, classrooms will remain a luxury that 20 million children cannot afford, as a generation’s future is traded to pay heat and light bills.

Pakistan closed 2025 with signs of economic stabilisation, but the public remains divided on whether the recovery has translated into broad-based prosperity, according to a nationwide survey conducted by the Institute of Cost and Management Accountants of Pakistan (ICMA).

The survey, which captures the views of citizens, professionals, students and business stakeholders, presents a mixed but cautiously hopeful picture for 2026, with governance, jobs and long-term reforms emerging as decisive factors for sustained growth.

The survey indicates that 54.3% of respondents acknowledged an improvement in the economy during 2025, pointing to easing inflation, higher remittances and a relatively more stable external position. These developments helped pull the country out of an immediate crisis phase. However, the recovery was uneven, as 45.7% described the year as turbulent, marked by highs and lows. Weak performance in agriculture and persistent fiscal pressures limited the benefits of stabilisation for a large segment of the population. Only 10.3% reported that 2025 turned out much better than expected, while 12.1% believed the economy showed steady performance, underscoring that consistent and inclusive growth remains elusive.

Looking ahead, public sentiment for 2026 reflects cautious optimism rather than strong confidence. The survey shows that 56.9% of respondents expect the economy to improve, while 43.1% believe it will remain stable. Within this group, 29.3% described the outlook as promising and 25% expect economic growth, largely driven by hopes of recovery in industry, exports and domestic demand. Yet only 2.6% view the economy as strong, highlighting that deep-rooted structural weaknesses, low investment levels and productivity challenges continue to weigh on long-term prospects.

The survey also reveals that economic performance alone is n`ot the public’s biggest concern for 2026. Political instability tops the list of anxieties, cited by 33.6% of respondents, reflecting fears that policy uncertainty and leadership conflicts could derail fragile gains. Youth unemployment follows closely at 29.3%, signalling the urgency of translating macroeconomic stability into job creation for a rapidly growing workforce. High inflation, though easing, still worries 26.7% of respondents, while extreme weather and climate-related risks were considered a relatively distant concern by 10.3%.

Respondents sent a strong message on what Pakistan must stop doing to secure sustainable progress. According to the survey, 31% called for ending the repetition of failed policies and short-term fixes that have historically failed to deliver lasting growth. Political conflict was identified by 28.4% as a major obstacle that creates uncertainty and weakens investor confidence. Another 26.7% emphasised reducing reliance on foreign loans, urging a shift towards self-reliance through higher domestic revenues and stronger exports. Neglect of public services such as health and education was also flagged as an issue that must be addressed to improve social and economic outcomes.

In terms of priorities for 2026, the public overwhelmingly placed people before physical projects. A striking 84% of respondents stressed that job creation and human development should take precedence over large infrastructure initiatives. Within this, 45.7% demanded urgent action on employment generation, while 37.9% highlighted education and skills development as critical to tackling youth unemployment and building a competitive workforce. Infrastructure and healthcare were still considered important, but respondents viewed them as secondary to creating widespread opportunity and improving human capital.

On the external front, the survey highlights a pragmatic approach to international partnerships. China emerged as the most important partner for 2026, cited by 44.8% of respondents for its role in investment, infrastructure development and China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)-related projects. Neighbouring countries followed at 26.7%, reflecting the importance of regional peace and trade. Gulf countries were identified by 18.1% for their contribution through jobs and remittances, while 10.3% pointed to the United States for technology and education links. Overall, respondents emphasised that foreign relations should be driven by tangible economic benefits rather than symbolic alliances.

The survey also reflects a growing sense of individual responsibility in shaping economic outcomes. More than half of respondents, 56.9%, said they plan to learn new digital skills in 2026 to adapt to a technology-driven economy. Another 25% expressed intentions to start a business or project, highlighting entrepreneurial ambition, while mentoring and volunteering were seen as secondary priorities.

According to ICMA, the findings underline a clear public mandate: governance reform, job creation and efficient public services matter more to citizens than headline projects. With 62.9% calling for efficient delivery of public services, the message for policymakers is that 2026 will be judged not just by economic indicators, but by whether stability translates into better daily lives for ordinary Pakistanis.