Home Blog Page 2780

American flags torched, riot police clash with protesters ahead of Trump Davos arrival

0
American flags torched, riot police clash with protesters ahead of Trump Davos arrival

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Violent protests erupted in several Swiss cities as American flags were burned and riot police clashed with demonstrators ahead of President Trump’s arrival in Davos, Switzerland, for the World Economic Forum.

Trump is scheduled to arrive Wednesday and is expected to deliver a speech at the annual gathering of global political leaders and corporate executives.

His visit comes amid heightened tensions with European leaders after Trump doubled down on his push to acquire Greenland for U.S. national security reasons and declined to rule out military options.

TRUMP SAYS ‘YOU’LL SEE’ WHEN ASKED HOW FAR HE’LL GO ON GREENLAND TAKEOVER

Swiss riots erupt in multiple cities as anti-Trump protesters march against President Trump’s World Economic Forum appearance, with police deploying water cannons. (Michael Buholzer/Keystone via AP)

The Davos forum, held in eastern Switzerland, is one of the world’s most high-profile economic summits, bringing together heads of state, CEOs, bankers and policymakers to discuss global trade, security and geopolitics.

Around 300 protesters marched through Davos Jan. 19 to oppose both the forum and Trump’s planned appearance.

Chanting slogans and holding banners reading “Trump not welcome,” demonstrators accused Swiss authorities of legitimizing what they described as authoritarian and plutocratic politics by hosting the U.S. president.

GREENLAND NEEDS US FOR DEFENSE BECAUSE ‘EUROPEANS PROJECT WEAKNESS,’ US TREASURY SECRETARY ARGUES

Davos protests

The protests turned violent as demonstrators burn American flags and clash with riot police ahead of President Trump’s Wednesday arrival in Switzerland. (Michael Buholzer/Keystone via AP)

Images from the protests showed masked demonstrators setting fire to American flags, while local media reported smashed windows and other property damage.

Swiss outlet Swissinfo reported clashes broke out after police moved to disperse the crowd

Officers in full riot gear deployed water cannons, chemical irritants and rubber bullets and said they were targeted with fireworks.

The outlet also reported a police statement said “paint bags were thrown at the facades and shop windows were smashed on the corner of Bahnhofstrasse and Uraniastrasse”, with the amount of property damage unknown.

Two police officers were also reportedly hit by stones but remained unharmed.

Similar demonstrations were held elsewhere, including in Bern, where a protest was broken up as police sealed off the city center.

PROTESTS EXPLODE IN GREENLAND AMID TRUMP TAKEOVER PUSH: ‘WE ARE NOT INTERESTED IN BEING AMERICANS’

Davos protests

Roughly 300 demonstrators clashed with riot police who deployed water cannons and rubber bullets. (Michael Buholzer/Keystone via AP)

In Zurich, thousands marched Sunday night, with one placard reading, “Put the Trumpster in the dumpster.”

Activists from the Swiss NGO Campax also projected a cartoon image of Trump onto a ski slope near Davos, branding him the “Spirit of plutocracy.”

Trade tensions are expected to dominate discussions at the summit, alongside talks on the war in Ukraine and broader global security concerns.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Trump addressed the Greenland issue in a social media post early Tuesday.

“As I expressed to everyone, very plainly, Greenland is imperative for National and World Security,” Trump wrote. “There can be no going back — on that, everyone agrees. The United States of America is the most powerful country anywhere on the globe, by far.”

‘Potentially fatal’ cans of tuna under recall were shipped to multiple states

0
Canned tuna that was under recall was accidentally shipped to stores, FDA warns

Tuna lovers stocking up on Genova brand cans may want to double-check their items to make sure they weren’t part of an FDA recall.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration warned consumers Monday that canned tuna that had been recalled last year was accidentally shipped to stores in several states.

According to the recall alert, Tri-Union Seafoods said that a third-party “inadvertently” shipped a load of recalled tuna out to retailers. The tuna had been quarantined as part of a February 2025 recall.

The initial recall was issued after Tri-Union Seafoods learned that one of its cans’ easy-open pull tab lid was defective. Not only could the cans leak, but they also run the risk of becoming “contaminated by clostridium botulinuma a potentially fatal form of food poisoning,” according to a federal official.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration put out a warning to consumers that previously recalled tuna has been shipped out to retailers. The products’ cans can be damaged, allowing for both leakage and contamination by harmful bacteria
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration put out a warning to consumers that previously recalled tuna has been shipped out to retailers. The products’ cans can be damaged, allowing for both leakage and contamination by harmful bacteria (Jc Milhet/Hans Lucas/AFP via Getty Images)

The recalled cans were shipped to retailers in the following areas:

Meijer — Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin

Giant Foods — Maryland and Virginia

Safeway, Albertsons, Vons, and Pavilions — California

The recalled products can be identified by specific can codes and Best if Used By dates, as well as by UPC.

The two recalled products are:

Genova Yellowfin Tuna in Olive Oil 5.0 oz 4 Pack, with a UPC number of 4800073265, using the can codes S84N D2L and S84N D3L and with a best if used by date of January 21, 2028.

Genova Yellowfin Tuna in in Extra Virgin Olive Oil with Sea Salt 5.0 oz, with a UPC number of 4800013275., using the can code S88N D1M and with a best if used by date of January 17, 2028.

Officials have warned consumers not to use the tuna, “even if it does not look or smell spoiled.” The recall further warns that anyone who has consumed the tuna and feels to ill to seek “immediate medical attention.”

Anyone with recalled cans can return them to the place of purchase to request a refund.

AFCON 2025 Final – Nothing could have been more embarrassing for African football

0
AFCON 2025 Final - Nothing could have been more embarrassing for African football

Morocco have never made any secret of their desire to write history at the 2025 Africa Cup of Nations, although never in their wildest dreams could they – or any of us, quite frankly – imagine how the continental showpiece would conclude, amidst acrimony, animosity, accusation, as two footballing brothers almost provoked a diplomatic incident in Rabat.

Of course, the hosts’ ambitions are all in tatters.

There has been no end to their 50-year wait to return to the pinnacle of the African game. There’s been no fairytale title triumph on home soil. There’s no crowning glory for FA President Faouzi Lekjaa, adored by his own people, summoned by the King, flanked by Gianni Infantino and Dr Patrice Motsepe, as this 15-year vision came to its realisation on January 18, 2026.

That alternative reality will never happen.

What we were left with was a chaotic, compelling, confused conclusion to this fascinating month of football, and 20 minutes of second-half stoppage time that will be discussed, analysed, pored over and speculated upon for years to come.

Let’s get the grand lines over with first; Senegal won the title, their second in the last three tournaments, their second ever, with Pape Gueye scoring a thunderous winner in extra time as Morocco missed a last-minute penalty to miss the chance to win it in 90 minutes… or, at least, the 20th minute of second-half stoppage time.

But such were the stormy storylines of this one, that the result and the title are almost subplots themselves against two penalty decisions that almost forced a first ever abandonment of a major international final… an argument could certainly be made that an abandonment would have been the correct decision.

First, Senegal scored what appeared to be the winner in the third minute of the originally allocated eight minutes of stoppage time, an extended period due to a facial injury sustained by Neil El Aynaoui which required extensive treatment.

Ismaïla Sarr, stooping, headed home after Abdoulaye Seck‘s header had rebounded off the bar beyond Yassine Bounou.

Senegal tore off in celebration, this was – after all – the first goal they’d scored in any AFCON final, having previously failed to net in 2002, 2019 or 2021. However, they were quickly pulled back after realising that referee Jean-Jacques Ndala had blown his whistle in the build-up due to a perceived push by Seck on Achraf Hakimi, as he made space for himself to take the initial header.

The defender certainly did appear to have his hands on Hakimi, while the Paris Saint-Germain man was playing his part in the tussle as well, but the nature of his extended, staggered fall to the turf suggested the foul wasn’t as clear cut as Ndala had initially thought.

The referee opted not to consult VAR to double check, despite insistent Senegalese suggestions that he should do exactly that, instead waving play on and allowing the flow of the game to continue.

It promptly went up the other end, where a Morocco corner led to Brahim Díaz – the tournament’s outstanding player – falling under pressure from El Hadji Malick Diouf, an incident that appeared not to initially spark the interest of Ndala.

However, Diaz was incensed, not letting Diouf’s intervention lie, and proceeded to harangue the linesmen, get up in the referee’s face, implore the 66,000-strong at the Prince Moulay Abdellah Stadium to join his cause, the big screen relaying his emotional pleas, VAR gesturing and angry responses to the officials’ hesitation, with the sense of injustice in the stadium intensifying as fans sniffed an opportunity for an innocuous incident to secure them a title victory at the death.

Eventually, Ndala relented, by which point, it appeared as though half of Morocco’s bench were already pouring onto the pitch insisting he examine the monitor. Receiving word through his earpiece that there was something to reassess, he strode over to the pitch side screen, with both sets of technical staff and substitutes crowding round the referee as he relayed the incident.

When he signalled for the spotkick, it was West Side Story all over again, with both sets of players and staff – who had been celebrating the fraternity between these two brother countries ahead of the final – squaring up to each other and getting increasingly physical as they debated the fairness of the decision to turn to VAR to validate one pro-Morocco incident, having ignored the chance to turn to VAR to validate a pro-Senegal incident moments earlier.

The burning sense of injustice spilled into the small portion of Senegal fans, an island of yellow and green in an ocean of red, and the country’s famous Gaindé supporter group, known for their pacifism, their inclusivity, their stadium-cleaning habits and relentless dancing, appeared determined to take matters into their own hands.

Some appeared hellbent on entering the field of play to accost the officials and defend their playing staff from Morocco’s physical affronts, others confronted the stadium stewards, some attempted to jump over the barriers, launching themselves as police and officials, as Moroccan authorities increasingly swelled into this corner of the stadium in order to neutralise any intended spill-over onto the pitch.

Some supporters, painted all in yellow, were hauled away by officials, while others threw projectiles which rained down on the stadium stewards, one of whom had to be stretchered away with an injury to his upper body.

Some of the fans jumped onto the electronic advertisement boards and appeared determined to dislodge them from their stanchions, trampling all over the 1XBET electronic display until the boardings fell flat, extinguished.

Steadily, in this corner of the stadium, the sheer volume of riot police and assorted officials Morocco sent to quell the Senegalese storm eventually – albeit belatedly – got things under control, although on the pitch, things were taking a very different turn.

Seemingly under instruction from enraged head coach Pape Thiaw, Senegal’s players started departing down the tunnel, leaving only Sadio Mané as peace-maker elect to try to salvage any semblance of a final.

Thaw’s motivations weren’t clear, with a combination of the ongoing security risk and a protest against the refereeing decisions being the chief theories behind his decision.

“What we felt was injustice,” match winner Pape Gueye told ESPN. “There had been a foul against us before and the ref chose not to look at VAR, we were frustrated, as you said.”

For several minutes, the fate of the match hung in the balance; would Senegal forfeit, only moments before the end, of a major continental final? Would Morocco’s 50-year wait be ended in this fashion, in these circumstances? Was the ongoing security situation a legitimate reason for Thiaw to remove his players?

Eventually, after consultation with former Senegal head coach Claude Le Roy among others, Mane agreed to beckon his players back onto the pitch, although by this point, simmering tensions between the players were again bubbling into physical altercations, with Seck and Ismael Saibari squaring up to one another.

“Sadio told us to come back on the pitch, to remobilise us,” Gueye revealed, and in a week where the future of the Nobel Peace Prize continues to be discussed, the Senegal legend’s example of measured leadership and admirable calm in the face of such circumstances, on a stage such as this, certainly deserve commendation.

It was almost surreal, as Diaz, who had had to wait for over ten minutes to take the spotkick that he had fought so passionately to receive, eventually stepped up to take it while riot police still quelled Senegalese attempts to enter the field of play on the other side of the stadium.

Should play really be allowed to continue in such circumstances?

The change in Diaz’s mood was notable. He cut an almost forlorn, resigned, isolated figure as he prepared to take the kick, placing the ball on the spot that Édouard Mendy had been booked for attempting to scuff and spoil.

And then he missed.

play

1:29

‘Worst penalty I’ve seen in my life!’ – Udoh on Brahim Diaz’s Panenka

Colin Udoh explains the chaos in the AFCON final between Morocco and Senegal before Brahim Diaz’s missed penalty.

But this wasn’t just a missed penalty. This was the mother of all missed penalties, as the Real Madrid forward stepped up, advancing intensely, before slowing his run, and somehow kicking a half-hearted panenka into the waiting arms of Mendy.

Immediately, there were suggestions that he had deliberately fluffed the spotkick, preferring to fail as a hero than win as a villain, but it’s a hard theory to stand up given how determined he had been in appealing for the foul, his kiss to the ball as he approached to take, and his decision to panenka his finish rather than kick it wide.

If Diaz did undergo a sudden change of heart, deciding that given the injustices of the previous 10 minutes, it wasn’t worth winning this way, the swing in his energy was transformative.

The complete lack of Senegal celebration at Mendy’s save, eerie in its acceptance, and Diaz’s immediate turn around and trot back to the centre-circle after failing suggested a gentleman’s agreement. Where were the reactions and responses one would expect from the stress and the tension, the anxiety of such a situation? Why did not one single player go and thank or congratulate Mendy…he’s just kept your AFCON dream alive?!

The other suggestion is damning for Diaz; that, in this moment, with 50 years of hurt at his twinkling toes, he opted to try to chip Mendy – no stranger to high-pressure panenkas – rather than just hold his nerve and lash the ball home…or let Youssef En-Nesyri take it – and humiliated himself in the process, denying Morocco their moment of glory as a nation held its breath.

Perhaps he just lost his head as his composure collapsed, given the delay, given the pressure, and his nerve deserted him when he needed it most.

Perhaps we’ll never know if Diaz sacrificed himself on the altar of fair play, or whether he’s guilty of the most calamitous final failure that the sport has ever seen, but it was a moment that was as baffling as it was breathtaking, as bizarre as it was bewildering.

Ultimately, it may be for the best that the match was won with Gueye’s extra-time thunderbolt rather than Diaz’s stoppage-time penalty, which could have hung in history as a tarnished result, and damaged…perhaps irretrievably…Morocco-Senegalese relations.

Thiaw appears set to rival Diaz as the villain of the piece, particularly if it’s proven that he removed his players in protest at the referee’s decision.

“A lot of time passed before [Brahim] was able to take the penalty, and this put him off,” Morocco head coach Walid Regragui told ESPN. “The match we had was shameful for Africa.”

“What Pape [Thiaw] did tonight doesn’t honour Africa. He’s an African champion now, so he can say what he wants, but they stopped the match for over ten minutes,” he added. “That doesn’t excuse Brahim for the way he hit [the penalty], he hit it like that and we have to own it. We need to look forward now, and accept that Brahim missed it.”

It’s important that Thiaw’s decision isn’t just seen in the context of those two incidents; it was a response to the perception that’s build up throughout the tournament that Morocco are not above stacking the deck in their favour in an almost desperate attempt to win the AFCON.

From Hugo Broos’s complaints about South Africa’s training facilities to Tom Saintfiet’s objections to the refereeing decisions not being equal as Mali held the hosts in the group stage, from Akor Adams‘ insistence that journalists interview the referee after Nigeria’s semifinal elimination by the Atlas Lions to the ball boys’ constant removing of Stanley Nwabali‘s towel during Wednesday’s game, this is a narrative that has developed and taken root during the tournament, with shades of Argentina’s manipulation of the 1978 World Cup not too far from mind.

Senegal have experienced this as well, but they came prepared.

On Friday evening, the Federation released a press release deploring four aspects of the treatment they’ve received in the build-up to the final – accommodation, logistics, training facilities and ticketing – putting pressure on the Confederation of African Football to affirm the organisers’ impartiality.

They were prepared for the towel-stealing antics as well during the final, with Mendy’s goalkeeping deputy at one point having to physically wrest the stopper’s towel away from no fewer than four Moroccan pitch-side adolescents, supposedly there to assist in the fair running of proceedings, not interfere to disrupt one of the finalists.

Even Hakimi contributed to this towel-stealing fiasco at one point in the contest, such was Moroccan desperation to give themselves every advantage they could, beyond their considerable technical and tactical qualities.

This is not to excuse Thiaw’s actions, but merely to provide context and explain the extent to which his actions were not an isolated response to those two refereeing decisions, but a broader protest – supposedly – against Morocco’s overall attempts to stack the deck in their favour.

“When a head coach asks his players to leave the pitch, when he’s saying things that already started in the press conference [before the match, when Senegal accused Morocco of unsporting tactics]…he needs to stay class, in victory as well as in defeat,” Regragui added, pointing the finger at Thiaw for instigating the scenes of farce that accompanied the extended stoppage time.

It’s not clear whether Senegal will be sanctioned for threatening to abandon the match, whether they would behave in such a way at the World Cup, in their match against France perhaps, or whether their behaviour will spark a precedent for teams simply threatening abandonment if they aren’t happy with a marginal VAR call or even the referee’s decision to consult VAR or not.

As with Diaz, how will history remember them? Will they be remembered for standing up for injustice on the grandest stage, for their backbone, and for potentially throwing away their AFCON participation? As revolutionaries against VAR? Will they be remembered for petulance and poor sportsmanship, and for winning the Nations Cup despite having abandoned the contest midway through? For delaying the restart to disrupt Diaz to the point of a meltdown, and then returning to reap the rewards?

And what of the AFCON itself? This is a tournament undergoing an identity crisis, a repetitional crisis, an existential crisis – largely accelerated by its own patrons – and its global reputation (entertainment notwithstanding) is unlikely to be enhanced by a night that will live in infamy.

Why Keith Urban’s daughters are avoiding his rumored girlfriend? Source

0
Why Keith Urban

Keith Urban’s daughters ‘refuse to meet’ his rumored new girlfriend

Keith Urban’s daughters are reportedly keeping a distance from his rumored girlfriend Karley Scott after Nicole Kidman’s shock split.

The Babygirl actress and the country star shocked fans in September 2025 by confirming their split following their 20 years of marriage.

Though the former couple finalized their divorce quietly, the emotional fallout is still lingering.

As per reports, Keith has moved on with 26-year-old rising country singer Karley but sources say the former The Voice coach’s move has caused their daughters, Sunday Rose and Faith Margaret, to firmly take their mother’s side in the matter.

Celebrity reporter Rob Shuter claims the girls are “refusing to meet Urban’s new girlfriend,” via Daily Mail.

An insider close to the family told Shuter, “The girls are really focused on mum right now. They’re adjusting to all the changes, and it’s natural they want to protect their space.”

Despite all, Keith is trying to balance his personal life and his duties as a father.

“He wants them to be comfortable, but the girls’ priority is their mum and their own well-being,” a second source added.

On the other hand, Kidman is “refreshed” and “optimistic” for the new chapter in life after divorce and “looking ahead to a busy and exciting year professionally too, with several projects coming up,” a source revealed to People.

Clinton spokesman lashes out at Comer over Epstein probe as contempt vote nears

0
Clinton spokesman lashes out at Comer over Epstein probe as contempt vote nears

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A top spokesperson for former President Bill Clinton sharply accused House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., of misrepresenting negotiations in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, insisting the Clintons never rejected sworn testimony or transcripts as the committee prepares to vote on contempt.

Angel Ureña, deputy chief of staff to the former president, said Comer was using a dispute over testimony format as a pretext to move toward contempt proceedings.

Ureña’s remarks came after Comer accused the Clintons of defying bipartisan subpoenas and demanding limits on testimony that would bar other lawmakers and prevent the creation of an official transcript.

“We never said no to a transcript. Interviews are on the record and under oath,” he wrote on X. “Whether it was written or typed isn’t why this is happening. If that were the last or only issue, we’d be in a different position. You keep misdirecting to protect you-know-who and God knows what.”

TOP GOP CHAIR ISSUES STARK WARNING TO CLINTONS IF THEY DEFY DEPOSITIONS IN EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION

A top Clinton spokesman accuses House Oversight Chairman James Comer of misrepresenting testimony talks as the committee moves toward a contempt vote tied to the Epstein investigation. (Melina Mara – Pool/Getty Images)

Comer said the Clintons’ attorneys made what he described as an untenable offer while the committee was moving toward contempt proceedings.

“Facing contempt of Congress, the Clintons’ lawyers made an untenable offer: that I travel to New York for a conversation with President Clinton only,” Comer wrote on X. “No official transcript would be recorded and other members of Congress would be barred from participating. I have rejected the Clintons’ ridiculous offer.”

Comer also accused the Clintons of seeking preferential treatment and failing to comply with lawful subpoenas.

BILL, HILLARY CLINTON RISK CRIMINAL CONTEMPT CHARGES AFTER DEFYING HOUSE SUBPOENAS IN EPSTEIN PROBE

“The Clintons’ latest demands make clear they believe their last name entitles them to special treatment,” he wrote. “The House Oversight Committee’s bipartisan subpoenas require the Clintons to appear for depositions that are under oath and transcribed.”

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is examining what the Clintons may have known about Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell, including scrutiny of Hillary’s role overseeing U.S. efforts to combat international sex trafficking while serving as secretary of state.

Comer said the lack of a formal record would undermine public accountability as the investigation moves forward.

JON STEWART SAYS CLINTONS SHOULD ‘ABSOLUTELY’ COMPLY WITH CONGRESSIONAL SUBPOENAS ON EPSTEIN

james comer

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., said Friday that former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would face contempt of Congress charges if they fail to cooperate with the panel’s Epstein probe. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

“The absence of an official transcript is an indefensible demand that is insulting to the American people who demand answers about Epstein’s crimes,” Comer wrote.

Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, who serves on the House Oversight Committee, told Fox News the panel bent over backward to accommodate the Clintons and said their refusal to comply with subpoenas left the committee no choice but to pursue contempt.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“We’ve seen multiple pictures of Bill Clinton with Epstein victims on Epstein’s plane engaged in all kinds of things that look quite unsavory, and I think the American people want answers, and they want to know what a former U.S. president was doing with this disgusting pedophile,” Gill said.

Fox News Digital has reached out to the Clinton Foundation for comment on the matter.

Israeli UN ambassador sends stark warning to Iran amid growing unrest

0
Israeli UN ambassador sends stark warning to Iran amid growing unrest

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Israel is watching Iran and is sending a blunt warning to the regime, which is facing international pressure over growing protests.

“We are in high readiness,” Israeli United Nations Ambassador Danny Danon told reporters. “We are ready with our defense capability, and we’re ready with our offensive capabilities… We would advise Iran not to test our capabilities.”

Danon also said that Israel was aware of where Iran is keeping its ballistic missiles, something Tehran used against Jerusalem during the 12-day war in June 2025.

In June 2025, Israel started “Operation Rising Lion,” which was aimed at destroying Iran’s nuclear capabilities. The U.S. ultimately got involved and launched “Operation Midnight Hammer,” in which it destroyed Iran’s Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities.

IRAN LOCKS NATION INTO ‘DARKER’ DIGITAL BLACKOUT, VIEWING INTERNET AS AN ‘EXISTENTIAL THREAT’

Israel is warning Iran against testing Jerusalem’s military strength.  (Alex Wong/Getty Images; Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via Reuters)

The diplomat said that what happened over the summer was a “partial” showing of Israel’s capabilities, though he did not elaborate on the point.

Danon told reporters that it would ultimately be up to the U.S. to decide what and whether this could happen and that Israel would “respect that decision.”

“Our position is very clear, it is a decision of the United States. We are ready,” Danon said. “We will not tell the U.S. if they should do it or not do it and when to do it.”

The diplomat also implied that the U.S. could be ready to come to Israel’s aid, saying that if Iran were to attack Israel that “the U.S. or somebody else will attack them.”

When asked about Danon’s remarks, a White House official told Fox News Digital that the president was watching the situation in Iran very seriously and that all options remained on the table. The official also credited the president’s threats for a series of cancelled executions.

Mike Waltz speaks to Danny Danon.

Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon warned that what happened last summer was just a “partial” showing of his country’s military might. (Eduardo Munoz/Reuters)

WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM BOOTS IRANIAN FOREIGN MINISTER FROM DAVOS SUMMIT AMID DEADLY CRACKDOWN ON PROTESTERS

On Tuesday, Iran warned President Donald Trump not to take action against its Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

“Trump knows that if any hand of aggression is extended toward our leader, we not only cut that hand, but also we will set fire to their world,” Gen. Abolfazl Shekarchi, a spokesman for Iran’s armed forces, said, according to The Associated Press.

The remarks came in response to Trump’s call for “new leadership in Iran.” He made the comment in an interview with Politico and told the outlet that Khamenei “is a sick man who should run his country properly and stop killing people.”

Since the protests in Iran began in late December, both the U.S. and Israel have expressed support for the civilians taking to the streets. President Donald Trump threatened that if the regime met protesters with violence, the U.S. would act. However, the U.S. has yet to intervene, and the president has signaled that he has held off on military strikes because of canceled executions.

“I greatly respect the fact that all scheduled hangings, which were to take place yesterday (over 800 of them), have been cancelled by the leadership of Iran. Thank you!” Trump said in a post on Truth Social.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt echoed a similar message to reporters, saying that all options remained on the table. She told reporters at a White House briefing that Trump told Iran “if the killing continues, there will be grave consequences.”

Protester holding sign in Tehran on Friday.

Anti-regime protests have raged across Iran since late December. (UGC via AP)

IRAN STATE TV HACKED TO SHOW EXILED CROWN PRINCE PAHLAVI

Israel has been open about its support for the people of Iran, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu saying on Jan. 11 that the country was “closely monitoring” what was taking place. He also vowed that once Iran was “liberated from the yoke of tyranny” Israel would be prepared to be a partner in peace.

“Israel is closely monitoring the events unfolding in Iran. The protests for freedom have spread throughout the country. The people of Israel, and the entire world, stand in awe of the immense bravery of Iran’s citizens. Israel supports their struggle for freedom and firmly condemns the mass killings of innocent civilians,” Netanyahu said at the beginning of his weekly cabinet meeting.

“We all hope that the Persian nation will soon be liberated from the yoke of tyranny, and when that day comes, Israel and Iran will once again be faithful partners in building a future of prosperity and peace for both nations,” he added.

Iran has also linked the U.S. and Israel to the protests. On Jan. 16, an Iranian ambassador said that both the U.S. and Israel were responsible for instilling “political destabilization, internal unrest and chaos.” The representative also blamed the U.S. and Israel for “the innocent blood that has been shed in my country.”

Anti-government protests in Iran.

The Trump administration previously threatened Iran if the regime met protesters with violence. (UGC via AP)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Days before the diplomat made his comments, the Iranian mission to the U.N. said on X, “The satanic plot hatched by the United States and the Zionist regime to fragment Iran and to engineer an internal civil war will be neutralized through the national solidarity of the Government and the people of Iran, the ignominy of which will remain upon them.”

Iranian officials frequently use the phrase “Zionist regime” to refer to Israel.

The U.S.-based Human Rights Activists News Agency, which tracks unrest in Iran, reported on Monday that the number of confirmed fatalities reached 4,029 since the protests began. The agency said at least 5,811 people were severely injured and that 26,015 people had been arrested during the protests.

Fox News Digital reached out to the State Department and the Iranian Mission to the U.N. for comment.

Actor Timothy Busfield ordered released from jail pending trial in child sex abuse case in New Mexico

0
Actor Timothy Busfield ordered released from jail pending trial in child sex abuse case in New Mexico

A judge has ordered that actor Timothy Busfield be released from jail as he awaits trial on child sex abuse charges.

The order Tuesday, by state district court Judge David Murphy during a detention hearing, is linked to accusations that Busfield inappropriately touched a minor while working as a director on the set of the series “The Cleaning Lady.”

The judge ordered that the defendant be released on his own recognizance, pending trial. Busfield will be supervised upon release by a pretrial service in Albuquerque, and can leave the state to live at home, the judge said. Under the conditions of his release, Busfield cannot be in possession of firearms or drugs and can’t have contact with the alleged victims.

Busfield, an Emmy Award-winning actor who is known for appearances in “The West Wing,” “Field of Dreams” and “Thirtysomething,” was ordered held without bond last week at his first court appearance. Busfield called the allegations lies in a video shared before he turned himself in.

Director and actor Timothy Busfield appears at a hearing in the Second District Judicial Court at the Bernalillo County Courthouse, Tuesday, Jan. 20, 2026, in Albuquerque, N.M.

AJ Skuy / AP


At the hearing Tuesday, Busfield was handcuffed and dressed in an orange jail uniform in a New Mexico state district court, while wife and actor Melissa Gilbert watched from the court gallery.

Gilbert was tearful while exiting the courtroom after the judge ordered Busfield’s release.

Gilbert, who played Laura Ingalls in the 1970s to ’80s TV series “Little House on the Prairie,” is on the list of potential witnesses submitted ahead of the hearing.

Albuquerque police issued a warrant for Busfield’s arrest earlier this month on two counts of criminal sexual contact of a minor and one count of child abuse. A criminal complaint alleges the acts occurred on the set of the series “The Cleaning Lady.”

According to the criminal complaint, an investigator with the police department says the child reported Busfield touched him on private areas over his clothing on one occasion when he was 7 years old and another time when he was 8. The boy’s twin brother told authorities he was also touched by Busfield, but did not specify where. He said he didn’t say anything because he didn’t want to get in trouble.

On Monday, Busfield’s attorneys submitted two brief audio recordings of initial police interviews in which the children say Busfield did not touch them in private areas. The attorneys in a court filing argue that the complaint characterizes the interviews as a failure to disclose abuse, but an “unequivocal denial is materially different from a mere absence of disclosure.”

According to the criminal complaint, one of the boys disclosed during a therapy session that he was inappropriately touched by the show’s director. Those records were obtained by police during the investigation.

Arguing Tuesday for Busfield’s continued detention, Bernalillo County Assistant District Attorney Savannah Brandenburg-Koch called evidence of abuse against Busfield strong and specific.

“The boys’ allegation are supported by medical findings and by their therapist,” Brandenburg-Koch said. “Their accounts were specific and not exaggerated.”

She also described a documented pattern of sexual misconduct, abuse of authority and grooming behavior by Busfield over the past three decades. Prosecutors also say witnesses have expressed fear regarding retaliation and professional harm.

“GPS is not going to tell this court if he is around children or talking to witnesses,” Brandenburg-Koch said.

Busfield’s attorneys have argued that the allegations emerged only after the boys lost their role in the TV show, creating a financial and retaliatory motive. The filings detailed what the attorneys said was a history of fraud by both the boys’ father and mother. They cited an investigation by Warner Bros. that found the allegations unfounded.

Busfield also submitted letters vouching for his character, and his attorneys say he passed an independent polygraph test.

Legal experts say New Mexico is among a few states that allow polygraph evidence in criminal cases, but a judge has final say over whether one can be used. There are strict requirements for admission.

Blake Lively claimed Justin Baldoni ‘made a monster’ of her, court docs reveal

0
Blake Lively claimed Justin Baldoni

Blake Lively claimed Justin Baldoni ‘made a monster’ of her, court docs reveal

Blake Lively branded Justin Baldoni a “rabid pig” after accusing him of “smearing” her in a past conversation with It Ends With Us author, as per a recent court document.

The 38-year-old actress’s text messages to Colleen Hoover were unveiled in newly unsealed court records, ahead of a summary judgment hearing scheduled for January 22, via People.

The conversation between Lively and Hoover took place back in July 2024.

“… Despite his repeated disturbing behavior and acts, I still feel bad for him,” Lively’s text meassage read. “To be reminded multiple times DAILY that he’s smearing me for … asking him not to sexually or emotionally harass me? For making his movie better? For calling in all the favors to turn out all the biggest musicians and entertainers to contribute to making his movie better? For leading a marketing campaign for free?”

The Gossip Girl alum continued, “I literally don’t know a single thing I’ve done that he can smear me about. Ryan says he should be writing me apology and thank you letters every day. And instead he chooses to make a monster outta me … but what’s my crime. I’ve only ever stayed focused on the work and given him EVERY opportunity to make it better. And he just keeps behaving like a rabid pig.”

Hoover showed her support for Lively and called out Baldoni’s behaviour.

She replied, “Exactly. I think as women and mothers we’re taught to give grace until there’s nothing left of us, but in times like these sometimes it’s good to be reminded that grace is wonderful until it compromises your integrity.

“I sometimes start to feel bad too but I can guarantee you he hasn’t felt an ounce of guilt. He’s too busy playing victim while you work your ass off to make a better movie that he gets credit for.”

Snap settles social media addiction lawsuit ahead of trial

0
Snap settles social media addiction lawsuit ahead of trial

Snapchat’s parent Snap has settled a social media addiction lawsuit just days before the landmark case was due to go to trial in Los Angeles.

Terms of the deal were not announced as it was revealed by lawyers at a California Superior Court hearing, after which Snap told the BBC the parties were “pleased to have been able to resolve this matter in an amicable manner”.

Other defendants in the case include Instagram parent Meta, ByteDance’s TikTok and Alphabet’s YouTube, none of which have settled.

The plaintiff, a 19-year old woman identified by the initials K.G.M., alleged that the algorithmic design of the platforms left her addicted and affected her mental health.

In the absence of a settlement with the other parties, the trial is scheduled to go forward against the remaining three defendants, with jury selection due to begin on 27 January.

Meta boss Mark Zuckerberg is expected to testify, and until Tuesday’s settlement, Snap CEO Evan Spiegel was also set to take the stand.

Meta, TikTok and Alphabet did not respond to BBC inquiries seeking reaction to the settlement.

Snap is still a defendant in other social media addiction cases that have been consolidated in the court.

The closely watched cases could challenge a legal theory that social media companies have used to shield themselves.

They have long argued that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 protects them from liability for what third parties post on their platforms.

But plaintiffs argue that the platforms are designed in a way that leaves users addicted through choices that affect their algorithms and notifications.

The social media companies have said the plaintiffs’ evidence falls short of proving that they are responsible for alleged harms such as depression and eating disorders.

New stamps mark 50th anniversary of first commercial Concorde flights

0
New stamps mark 50th anniversary of first commercial Concorde flights

A new set of stamps and co-ordinated nose drop events will mark the 50th anniversary of the first commercial Concorde flights.

The Royal Mail said it has produced 12 stamps which pay tribute to the supersonic aircraft’s “innovation, elegance and engineering excellence”.

The nose cones of three Concorde planes exhibited in the UK will be moved simultaneously at 11.40am on Wednesday to mark the moment the first commercial Concorde flights departed on January 21 1976.

A British Airways flight set off from London’s Heathrow airport to Bahrain at the same time as an Air France flight departed from Paris’s Charles de Gaulle airport for Rio.

The main set of eight Concorde stamps features photography of British Airways’ Concordes throughout their history, including the first and last commercial flights.

One of the stamps depicts four Concordes flying in formation to celebrate 10 years of service.

A further four stamps are presented in a miniature sheet.

David Gold, director of external affairs and policy at the Royal Mail, said: “Concorde remains one of the most iconic achievements in aviation history, and we’re proud to celebrate its legacy with this special set of stamps.

“These designs pay tribute to the innovation, elegance and engineering excellence that made Concorde a symbol of British ingenuity and ambition.”

Hamish McVey, director of marketing for British Airways, said: “Concorde represents a landmark chapter in our history at British Airways, embodying the pioneering spirit of British innovation and creativity that remains integral to our brand today.”

Concorde planes have distinctive hydraulically operated nose cones designed to move down during take-off and landing to give pilots better visibility of runways.

The aircraft at Aerospace Bristol, Manchester Airport Runway Visitor Park and Imperial War Museum Duxford in Cambridgeshire will drop their noses in front of spectators on Wednesday.

Brooklands Museum in Surrey, which also has a Concorde on display, is hosting a dinner on Wednesday night when aviation enthusiasts will be able to hear from eight former Concorde pilots and view archive material relating to the jet.

Last week, the Royal Mint launched a new 50p coin celebrating Concorde.

Born out of a joint Anglo-French project, Concorde’s success was savoured as a moment of intense national pride.

Most impressive of all was its speed. A cruising velocity of twice the speed of sound, or 1,350mph, allowed it to cover a mile in just 2.75 seconds.

Concorde quickly established itself as the way to travel for the discerning tycoon and Hollywood star.

Its fine wines and five-star cuisine assured it a large, well-heeled fan base, with regular passengers including the likes of Joan Collins, Sir Paul McCartney and Diana, Princess of Wales.

But the aircraft was retired from service in October 2003, with British Airways and Air France blaming a downturn in passenger numbers and rising maintenance costs.