London High Court judge rejects Reham Khan's assessment but accepts Zulfi Bukhari's pleas
 |
| The Zulfi Bukhari won the first round of contempt against Reham Khan |
ISLAMABAD - Former Special Assistant to the Prime Minister of Pakistan Imran Khan for Overseas Pakistanis Zulfi Bukhari has won the first round of defamation suit against Imran Khan's second ex-wife Reham Khan in the London High Court. ۔ According to the national newspaper Jang, Zulfi Bukhari's defamation suit against Reham Khan was heard in the London High Court.
The case was initially heard by Justice Karen Stein and reviewed the complaints made by Zulfi Bukhari against the allegations made by Reham Khan through YouTube, Tube Broadcast, and Tweets. The allegations stem from the sale of the Rosevale Hotel. During the hearing, Justice Karen Stein did not accept Reham Khan's assessment regarding the publication but accepted Zulfi Bukhari's request.
In this regard, Reham Khan said that the issue of the sale of national assets was raised in the public interest. Zulfi Bukhari took the position that Mrs. Justin Karen Stein did not accept Reham Khan's explanation. The defamation suit began on December 6, 2019, when Reham Khan alleged in a YouTube broadcast that Zulfi Bukhari had an interest in the sale of PIA's US-owned Hotel Rose Welt and national assets. Is being sold to benefit people like Zulfi Bukhari who is a robber.
Zulfi Bukhari's lawyer Barrister Claire Overman said that Reham Khan had accused Zulfi Bukhari of being corrupt and dishonest. Therefore, a very insulting "Chase Level One" should be imposed on him while Reham Khan took the position that Zulfi Bukhari's status was not harmed and he did so in the public interest. Three should be imposed.
Mrs. Justice Karen Stein was found guilty of corruption and dishonesty in the YouTube broadcast and defamatory allegations in 4 tweets and retweets. The case was filed in the London High Court in July last year. Reham Khan, quoting the Vlog of December 6, 2019, said that the purpose was to alert the people about the government of Pakistan and their broadcasts were based on the information on which the Aviation Minister objected to the formation of the task force. What was and is their right to question.
He told the judge that he did not use vulgar language or personally attacked Zulfi Bukhari. The judge said the eight broadcasts contained defamatory material. On this occasion, he also referred to winning a defamation case of Mir Shakeel-ur-Rehman against a private channel and said that he would continue to guide the cases regarding Urdu language broadcasters.
